The SIPTU Workers’ Rights Centre has secured an award of €11,500 against Clare Independent Deputy Violet Anne Wynne in a case concerning a worker who was unfairly dismissed, without any proper recourse to fair procedures, by the TD.
In its decision, made on 9th August, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) found that the Clarecastle based Ms Wynne should pay her former employee, Fiona Smyth compensation in the sum of €11,500 in redress for her dismissal.
The WRC Adjudicator, Louise Boyle, said in her decision that, “The respondent failed to engage in any procedures prior to dismissal, failed to provide the complainant with a reason for the dismissal, failed to provide an appeals process and would not engage with mediation. Whatever the reason(s) for the dismissal and which from Ms. Wynne’s evidence appears to have been varied, it is difficult to see how the decision to dismiss is within the range of reasonable responses of a reasonable employer in the circumstances.”
SIPTU Workers Rights Centre Advocate, Áine Feeney, said: “Fiona found herself in a situation where she was called to a performance review with her employer and, having asked for clarity around the meeting and the opportunity to have representation from her trade union in attendance, she was dismissed. This was done without her being given any reason by her employer.
“The employer was not willing to provide the policies applicable in the case and after the dismissal the employer failed to provide any appeal mechanisms, contrary to best practice. It is shocking to find that a legislator has such scant regard for the legal rights of a worker.”
Fiona Smyth said: “The outcome that we have achieved at the WRC recognises that what was done to me was wrong and that means more than anything. I am so grateful for the support, guidance and representation received from my Union throughout this exceptionally stressful experience.”
SIPTU Sector Organiser, Peter Glynn, said: “Fiona showed great strength and conviction in pursuing her claim when she had been faced with obstruction from the commencement of the process. Her commitment to highlight her treatment and ensure that her legal rights were vindicated, must be commended, particularly when her employer is a public representative.”